Leica CL Test Report19 Sep 2017, by Leica in
Two and a half years ago Leica presented the Q (Typ 116), which was reminiscent of the M series with its 28mm fixed lens with traditional aperture ring and depth-of-field scale. The concept of a compact camera with a full-frame sensor has proved to be a huge success for Leica and the camera has a lot of fans – even outside the usual Leica community.
Leica followed this shortly afterwards in winter 2015 with the Leica SL (Typ 601), the first mirrorless system camera for professional photographers that features the amazing EyeRes© electronic viewfinder that still sets it apart from other cameras. After trying out models from other manufacturers, the SL was the first mirrorless camera that met my requirements and I’ve now been using it for the past 2 years for my wedding and event reportages.
A year earlier, in 2014, Leica launched a camera inspired by a smartphone – the T (Typ 701) – that was upgraded, renamed to Leica TL and since July 2017 lives on as the TL2.
Each of these models has something special; loved by some and criticized by others. There are those that would like a bayonet for the very popular Q to be able to adapt lenses. The SL is often criticised as being too big, too heavy combined with the SL zooms (which is nonsense if you look at comparable DSLR cameras from other manufacturers), and when it comes to the TL2 there is divided opinion on the lack of viewfinder and on the touch display’s operating concept.
There seems to be general consensus on the image quality typical for Leica and on the overall perceived quality of the different models.
Now there’s a new player on the team with the Leica CL and the question is now of course where this camera will be positioned in the range, what makes it so special and what qualities it has in common with the other models. How much Q is there in the CL? Is it maybe a mini SL, the successor of the Leica X or just a sister to the TL2?
Leica TL2 (left), Leica SL (back), Leica Q (right) and Leica CL (front)
The Leica CL with TL2 (left) und Q (right)
Leica CL with Apo-Macro-Elmarit-TL 1:2.8/60mm ASPH.
Rumours about a new APS-C camera with a TL bayonet and code name ‘Clooney’ have been circulating on the internet since spring of this year.
In autumn, I had the opportunity to try out the Leica CL(-ooney) extensively during the beta test und give Leica feedback. This article is highly subjective and describes my personal impressions and experiences during the test period. I have placed an emphasis on aspects that are important to me in a camera based on my kind of photography and have touched on or skipped details that are not relevant to me.
I haven’t done any lab tests but used the camera in practice as a wedding and event photographer. To get a more all-round picture and to try out some features in peace I also took the Leica CL along on some of my private projects and used it in some everyday life scenarios. The question that I wanted to answer was: Do I get the pictures that I envisaged and how well does the camera help me achieve them?
In the following description, I often compare the CL with the SL, Q or TL2 because I assume that some readers already own or are familiar with one of these models and the information can give you a reference point to the CL. I don’t (yet) have a Leica M in my portfolio so I can’t draw comparisons to it here.
Let me start by saying that the Leica CL offers ‘a lot of camera’ in spite of its compact dimensions and that it mastered all of the tasks I gave it during my test with ease. I was actually quite reluctant to send the test camera back to Wetzlar and will no doubt be buying myself one once it is officially launched.
It’s a huge advantage, in my opinion, to be able to use all available Leica lenses on the SL, TL2 and CL and not have to equip yourself with lenses from other manufacturers (that would otherwise be redundant). I can also use my Sigma BP-51 spare battery for the Q with the CL, which is really practical.
The Leica CL is an APS-C system camera with 24 MP and as far as I know, has the same 23.6 x 15.7 mm sensor as the TL2 and offers 6016 x 4014-pixel resolution in DNG (6000 x 4000 in JPG).
According to the data sheet the dimensions are 131 x 78 x 45mm. Leaving out the electronic viewfinder and the bayonet, I measured a depth of 31 mm, which makes the body of the CL slightly thinner than the Q, although the CL is roughly the same height as the TL2 (without the viewfinder).
Leica CL with TL2 (left), Q (centre) and as a trio (right)
What’s not a surprise is that the CL takes DNGs or JPGs (or both together). The camera has an SD card slot and supports SD /SDHC /SDXC cards and the UHSII standard.
The Leica CL has integrated Wi-Fi, but does away with all types of connections like USB, HDMI or microphone connection.
The L bayonet gives you the option of seven TL lenses, the SL lens range and – with an adapter – all the M lenses. The Novoflex SL/EOS adapter for the Canon bayonet is not compatible. I can’t say anything about the Nikon adapter but I assume that it would also trigger an error message on the CL. To use other manufacturers’ lenses, you need a simple adapter that doesn’t transfer lens information. This means that you can’t use the autofocus or set the aperture via the camera.
Body and Design
When you first look at the camera, a few design elements borrowed from the current Leica portfolio are noticeable. The back of the camera, with only three buttons to the left of the display and the 4-way controller on the right, is very reminiscent of the M10, and the shape of the body is pretty much the same as the Q.
The display is a little further to the right compared to the Q to make space for the electronic viewfinder. That’s why, unlike the Q, there is no space left for an indent for the thumb on the right-hand side.
New features include a small top display and the two control dials on top of the camera that also have settings buttons in the middle. I’ll describe the configuration later on.
The surface of the CL is more finely structured than the Q. The camera has a haptic quality and sits well in the hand with a good grip. However, the implied grip of the TL is more ergonomic in my opinion. I was able to use the optional hand grip of the Q on the CL even though it didn’t fit 100% and you can’t attach a strap. I’m sure that Leica will be offering these accessories for the CL too.
Overall, even without the red dot, you can see and feel that you are holding a Leica and one that remains true to the minimalistic principles of the German company.
The electronic viewfinder is rounder than on the Q and protrudes from the body a little.
To the left of the 3’’ touch display you’ll find a button for image display, one programmable function button and the menu button. On the right-hand side, there is the four-way button with a set button in the middle.
At the bottom left there is the loudspeaker and at the bottom right a status LED.
A feature that I found clever was that to set the dioptres, you pull the dial out and after pushing it back in again the value can’t be adjusted by mistake.